Sunday, April 1, 2018

CMBA Profile: Whimsically Classic

CMBA profiles one or two of our classic movie bloggers every month. This week, we’re featuring  Kayla Rhodes, of Whimsically Classic
Kayla, who writes the "Whimsically Classic" blog, describes herself as an "old soul," which may explain how she has so much to say about classic film. Her posts tend to be very detailed and informative, and her responses to our questions are no exception to her verbosity and wit. She would like readers to take a look at this post, her entry in last year's "National Classic Film Day" blogathon. She reviews her five favorite classic movie performers and shares why they mean so much to her. She also admits to using the opportunity to re-post favorite images of Errol Flynn and Gene Kelly, because, as she says, "If you can't post (and re-post) beefcake photos on your blog, where can you post them?" 

Here are her responses to our questions:

What sparked your interest in classic film?

Growing up in the 90s, I always watched the annual viewing of "Wizard of Oz" and also enjoyed watching AMC with my dad.  Back when AMC actually showed classic films and wasn't over saturated with repeats and commercials.  I remember Bob Dorian introducing the films much like Robert Osborne did for TCM.  Every Saturday morning, AMC used to show Laurel & Hardy and Three Stooges shorts. I also seem to remember AMC airing a New Years Eve marathon of The Marx Brothers.  I had always been aware of classic films and had no issues with them.  I would say, however, that I truly became infatuated with classic film when I discovered "I Love Lucy" on Nick at Nite in 1995 when I was 11.  I remember one summer evening I was bored and looking for something to watch.  I came across Nick at Nite and on it was an old black and white show.  As I watched it, I became entranced by the woman on the screen--Lucille Ball.  If I remember correctly, the very first episode of "I Love Lucy" that I saw was "L.A. at Last!" guest-starring William Holden.  I remember laughing so much when Lucy wears her fake nose and subsequently has to keep re-doing it when she accidentally moves it.  The next evening, I watched "I Love Lucy" again and soon I was hooked.  Every night at 8:00pm, I had to watch "my shows."  In addition to 'Lucy,' I became a big fan of the other shows in the lineup as well.  However, my heart will always belong to "I Love Lucy."  From my love of 'Lucy,' soon I wanted to know everything I could about her.  I was also an frequent visitor to the city library where I checked out every Lucille Ball biography that was available.  It was from these books that I learned about the movie career Lucille Ball had prior to "I Love Lucy."  

It was about at this time when TCM debuted on cable.  I remember seeing it on TV and learning that it was wholly dedicated to classic film.  From then on, every Sunday, I would scour the new TV Guide insert in the newspaper to see if TCM was airing any Lucille Ball movies that week.  When they'd air, I'd try to watch them, or try to set up the VCR to record the films.  I remember that one of these recordings ended up being "The Long, Long Trailer," my absolute favorite movie of all time.  I also remember seeing "Du Barry Was a Lady" starring Lucy and Gene Kelly.  It was from this film that I discovered Gene Kelly.  I remember seeing "Singin' in the Rain" in the TV Guide once and I made a point to watch it.  From then on, I loved Gene Kelly and subsequently loved Debbie Reynolds and Donald O'Connor.  This pattern of discovering new actors and films continued on and has continued since.  
What makes a film a "classic" in your opinion?

Many people like to assign a specific time frame (e.g. Silent era through Studio Era) to declare a film "classic," however, I don't agree that that is entirely accurate.  To me, a classic is a film that still resonates with an individual over time.  "Citizen Kane" is often touted as a classic, but if a person dislikes the film, he or she may be hesitant to declare it a classic.  There may be another film that was universally panned by critics upon release and may still be considered mediocre today, but if a person absolutely loves it, then who are we to say that that film isn't a classic?  It is a classic to the person who loves it.  I think the term "classic" is very personal to the movie fan.  Watching a film can be a very personal experience and people can come away with very different perspectives.

What classic film(s) do you recommend to people who say they hate old movies?

Before suggesting any type of film, first I would pity this person for having such a narrow outlook on film and immediately dismissing decades worth of filmmaking purely because it might lack phony special effects like CGI or color.  After I got over my initial annoyance, I'd ask the person questions and try to gauge if they'd even be open to watching an old film.  Some people are just so set in their ways that trying to get them to watch an old film would be meaningless.  If they are open to watching a classic film and maybe they just haven't been exposed to the right film, I'd ask them what types of films they enjoy.  If someone loves mystery/thrillers, I may suggest an Alfred Hitchcock film like Rear Window or To Catch a Thief.  If someone were interested in horror, I might suggest Frankenstein or Psycho.  Someone who loves romance might enjoy Brief Encounter or perhaps Sabrina.  If someone loves musicals and thinks that La La Land is the greatest thing ever, I might suggest an infinitely better musical like Singin' in the Rain or Funny Face.  For comedy lovers, I'd suggest my favorite The Long Long Trailer or maybe Some Like it Hot.  It someone loves overwrought dramas like I do, I would suggest Picnic or maybe A Summer Place.  Finally, if the person is into movies about teenagers like High School Musical, I might suggest Gidget or maybe one of the Beach Party movies. 

Why should people care about classic film?

People should care about classic film because these are the films that provided the foundation for all films that have come since.  Without Alfred Hitchcock, we might not have the unique storytelling devices like the McGuffin that we have today.  Without Hitchcock, maybe Stan Lee wouldn't be making cameos in all the Marvel films! Orson Welles' innovative filming techniques for Citizen Kane were a landmark in cinematography and storytelling.  The innovative special effects in films like The Wizard of Oz and King Kong provide the groundwork for the special effects that have come since.  Classic films also serve as a time machine.  Since time travel does not exist, movies are one of the very few ways we have to see what life may have been like during previous eras.  As someone born in the mid-80s, I am interested in films made before then so I can see what things may have been like before I was born.  Don't get me wrong, I love 90s movies too, but I was there.  I want to see what World War Two era might have been like in the United States.  Maybe I want to know what cars looked like in the 1950s.  Movies can answer my questions.  I've learned a lot about what types of technologies were available in different eras.  Who doesn't love the big computer in Desk Set? Or the Auto-Mat in Easy Living?  Along those lines, classic film can also serve as an escape.  When you just can't bear seeing one more message film trying to make a point about racism or domestic violence or what not, what's wrong with going back in time to 1930s New York and spending the evening drinking martinis with Nick and Nora Charles? I love to use movies to escape into another a world, a world I cannot visit without film.  

What is the most rewarding thing about blogging?

Having a space to share my enthusiasm and love for a particular film, television show, actor, song, etc.  Even if it's the smallest little thing about an episode of "The Brady Bunch" or what not, I love being able to have a space where I can be a total fangirl for a second and gush.  I love focusing on everything I love about classic film and television.  I also enjoy receiving comments about my articles and even having small discussions about them, because it's rewarding to know that someone actually spent time reading what you wrote.  I do read other members' blogs too and need to become better at commenting, because I truly appreciate everyone's articles and sometimes am in awe of what they produce. 

What challenges do you face with your blog, and how do you overcome them?

Having enough time to write in the blog and being motivated to do so.  Sometimes I overwhelm myself by signing up for too many blogathons, because everything sounds like so much fun.  I also worry that I need to vary my content more and have other articles aside from blogathons.  I also struggle with trying to figure out what niche I want my blog to fill.  I don't have issues finding my voice, because I can write and know what I want to write.  I am still trying to figure out how I can organize my blog so that I feel like it's unique from others but isn't consuming all my time.  I have a lot of great ideas, but I need to figure out if I can execute them without getting overwhelmed, becoming frustrated and quitting.  

What advice would you give to a new blogger?

Write about what you love.  Don't worry about having a gimmick.  Be genuine.  Don't pretend to like something just because it's in vogue.  If you have a controversial opinion, then share it--for example, I am not a fan of Marlon Brando.  I don't think he's that great (except for in his 1950s career, when I do like his work) and I truly despise his mumbling.  I also find The Godfather incredibly boring.  Don't be ashamed of what you love or dislike.  Take these words from Dr. Seuss to heart--"Be who you are, and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who don't matter don't mind."  I love blogs that truly show someone's personality.  I dislike blogs where someone is pretentious and writes a whole lot of words to say nothing. Finally this is basic, but edit and proofread.  And use separate paragraphs! Bad writing is a turnoff. 

Thanks so much Kayla! We'll see you and your boyfriend Errol Flynn at the next gala event!

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

CMBA eBooks Available on Amazon!

Last year, CMBA hosted two great blogathons: Underseen and Underrated and Banned and Blacklisted. We had a number of really fine entries for both events and these essays have been collected and edited by Annette Bochenek into two new ebooks available for purchase on Amazon and for free on Smashwords.

You may have seen them being promoted on Facebook at the CMBA Private Screening Room, but if not, here is some more detail about them.... please check them out!

Underseen and Underrated: Celebrating Lesser-Known Classic Films

This collection of ten essays turns the spotlight on rare films including Afraid to Talk ( 1932 ), Carrie ( 1952 ), Simon and Laura ( 1955 ), A Majority of One ( 1961 ), and Between the Lions ( 1977 ). John Greco, Patricia Schneider, Jocelyn Dunphy, and Ivan G. Shreve Jr. are among some of the contributors.

All proceeds from Amazon sales go towards the National Film Preservation Foundation.



Banned and Blacklisted: Too Hot to Handle 

This collection of thirteen essays explores the films and actors who were affected by censorship, whether it be the result of the Hays Code, racism, or the McCarthy-era blacklist scare. Contributors to this ebook include Lara Fowler, Annette Bochenek, Danilo Castro, and Kellee Pratt among others.

All proceeds from Amazon go towards the National Film Preservation Foundation.



Thursday, March 15, 2018

CMBA Profile: Chaplin Film by Film

CMBA profiles one or two of our classic movie bloggers every month. This week, we’re featuring  Brian J. Robb, of Chaplin: Film by Film
Chaplin: Film by Film is a project after our own heart. On the centenary of the release of each of Charlie Chaplin's movies, blogger Brian J. Robb posted an homage to that film. This gave him a very busy 2014, but as Chaplin's output slowed down, Robb opted to surge ahead of him (he's all the way up to September, 1918, now!). In general, each post includes a synopsis, basic production information, stills, historical background, film analysis, and some excerpts from contemporary reviews. Whether you're a complete novice or a Chaplin expert, you're bound to learn something and have fun doing so. 

Brian would like you to take a look at this post, in which he discusses Chaplin's historic contract with Mutual Film Company for $670,000, which made him the highest paid film maker at the time. It's an original write up of a much-reported event, one that contributed to the rise of the Hollywood "star system" that followed. According to Brian, "It’s a nice, self-contained story covering a pivotal period in Chaplin’s professional and personal life, and a good jumping on point for readers keen to discover more about Chaplin, including his two years of filmmaking prior to that point and everything that followed from it."

Brian J. Robb

Here are Brian's answers to our questions:

What sparked your interest in classic film?
In the 1980s, the BBC in the UK used to screen weekend matinees of classic movies, and on weekend late nights there’d be old horror movie double bills. Over holidays like Christmas and Easter there’d often be special seasons of Chaplin movies or Hitchcock movies or a Screwball Comedies season—it was basically a film education through stealth. That was where I first saw all the Laurel and Hardy movies (I eventually wrote a guide book to all their films). I used to watch these movies, often in the company of my Dad, unconsciously soaking up all the information I could. It led to me studying Film & Television at Glasgow University, then pursuing a career in entertainment journalism. That in turn led to me becoming a published author… gosh, for 25 years now, writing biographies of film stars, books on directors, or genres, like Silent Cinema.

What makes a film a "classic" in your opinion?
The ingredients are hard to define, and they can’t be manufactured. The Hollywood studio system was geared to mass produce movies in the Ford factory style, but despite that individual stars and directors carved a niche. It’s the combination of screenplay, director, the right stars, and serendipity. Often, though, a ‘classic’ movie can simply be in the eye of the beholder—there is something or some combination of things that simply attracts you to the movie.
What classic film(s) do you recommend to people who say they hate old movies?
A screwball comedy usually does the trick, Bringing Up Baby or The Philadelphia Story, both of which feature combinations of my favourite actors: James Stewart, Cary Grant, and Katharine Hepburn. His Girl Friday is a nice, accessible, yet fast paced film that can easily draw in someone not used to watching ‘old’ movies.

Why should people care about classic film?
It’s simply part of our cultural history that needs to be kept alive. It takes effort these days, as there are fewer chances for people to simply encounter these movies in the way I did growing up. In an ‘on demand’ world where (almost) everything is instantly available, you have to know what you're looking for. While having access to so much is great, the way movies are watched today precludes accidental discovery, especially by younger folk—you have to have the interest (perhaps inherited from parents) in order to seek out older films.

What is the most rewarding thing about blogging?
Engaging with a community of readers is the reason for doing it. With Chaplin Film by Film, I’ve given myself a firm structure. From 2014, I opted to cover each Chaplin movie 100 years to the day after release. That worked fine for the first three years or so, but as Chaplin slowed down his output, it was clear that is I kept up the 100 years later thing, I myself would be 100 years old by the time I hit 1967’s final Chaplin movie A Countess From Hong Kong. With that in mind, I’ve embarked upon monthly entries to cover the rest of Chaplin’s output, which’ll take me through to the end of 2019. After that, who knows…

What challenges do you face with your blog, and how do you overcome them?
I’m a professional writer, so the biggest challenge when I earn a living from producing words is finding the time to do the same thing for the simply pleasure of it. The structure I was following, however, gave me deadlines, so that tends to focus the mind. Beyond that, it is simply the constant challenge of finding new angles on things and trying not to simply repeat what people have written before or to fall into ‘received wisdom’. It’s difficult, but the ideal outcome is to find something new to say.

What advice would you give to a new blogger?
Make sure you are writing about a passion, as that’ll get you over any humps in the road. It is a commitment, so give some thought to the long haul—why are you doing it and what do you want to get out of it? Is this the right outlet for the kind of self-expression you are seeking? And make sure you’ve got something to say, as you can’t afford to bore potential readers.

Thanks for the interview, Brian! We'll see you and the little Tramp online!

Thursday, March 1, 2018

CMBA Profile: Classic Film Observations and Obsessions

CMBA profiles one or two of our classic movie bloggers every month. This week, we’re featuring Jocelyn Dunphy, of Classic Film Observations and Obsessions:

Classic Film Observations and Obsessions is the expression of one woman’s fixation on classic film. Jocelyn likes to focus on one actor, director, or theme in films and run through as many movies and as much reading as she can, until she moves on to another focus. In 2016, for example, she put a lot of time into Van Heflin, a one time winner of Best Supporting Actor who shows up in a surprising range of movies. More recently, she’s been looking at Werner Herzog, who she got to see live at a screening. When Jocelyn sinks her teeth into something, she doesn’t let go easily!

Jocelyn would like you to take a look at this post, from the centennial of the birth of actor Robert Mitchum. It’s another example of her going in depth into the workings of an actor who fascinate her. It’s a review of the 1973 Mitchum movie “The Friends of Eddie Coyle,” a lesser-known movie she was lucky enough to see screened in a theater in Boston. She tells us of the post, “I think it captures my own voice well, in how I logged my own reactions to the movie.  I think those who read it will get a good sense of who I am as a blogger and film enthusiast.” We would have to agree!

Here are her answers to our questions:

  1. What sparked your interest in classic film?

I’ve always loved history, and in fact majored in it in college, even though I went on to become a scientist.  I’d always enjoyed films about earlier times or made in the ‘classic’ era, but didn’t really become “obsessed” until about 2010.  It was then that I attended a local screening of Buster Keaton’s Steamboat Bill Jr. with live orchestral accompaniment.  I then had to watch everything Buster ever made, then moved on to Chaplin, then on to films from the early sound era….and when I found the amazing community of classic film lovers on Twitter and in the blogosphere, I decided I really needed to make watching and writing about classic film a major hobby.

  1. What makes a film a classic in your opinion?

When I tell people I like classic film, I have my own personal definition, which is twofold: a) any film during any era that has earned staying power through audience and/or critical acclaim, so by definition probably needs to be at least 20 years old to earn its ‘staying power’, and b) any film that was made before, say, 1970.  I find (a) to be a more traditional definition, but for me (b) is meaningful also because every film is a valuable cultural and historical record -- I am so interested in that.

  1. What classic films do I recommend to those who say they hate old movies?

I haven’t had much luck with this, but generally I think it’s best to try to pick films that have aged well, or perhaps don’t show their age quite as much as others.  Some people are turned off by older acting styles, etc., or films that are dialogue-heavy.  A film like The Manchurian Candidate has a lot of fascinating things going on, and is always compelling, with big stars that may attract some. It also is in black-and-white and may help a viewer get over any black-and-white phobia.  Those more inclined to comedy may love Some Like It Hot – can’t go wrong there!  I also think All About Eve is a great one to reel people in, and for those who may appreciate a Western, the original 3:10 to Yuma is great drama.

  1. Why should people care about classic film?

It’s an amazing art form and historical record at the same time.  That’s number one.  Number two is classic film is an entertainment treasure trove that’s virtually impossible to exhaust!

  1. What is the most rewarding thing about blogging? 
Not sure yet, since I’ve been at it only a little over two years.   For now, I would say it provides an outlet to share my enthusiasm for the minutiae of whatever film subject I’m writing about – it saves me from putting my friends and family to sleep with all my talk (haha).  Also, by participating in blogathons and being part of a blogging community, I learn so much and stretch myself.  Ultimately, learning about classic film makes me really happy, and is a huge reason why I blog.

  1. What challenges do you face with your blog, and how do you overcome them?

The primary challenge for me is, like many others I have a number of things going on in my life, and blogging regularly requires prioritizing it.  So at times my challenge is finding or dedicating the time required.  Of course, blogging is its own reward, as I mentioned in my answer to the previous question, and the satisfaction I derive from producing a good post is motivation.  Second, while sometimes the topic and content of a post come easily, other times I struggle with coming up with a good topic – I wonder if too much has already been written on the subject, or whether it will interest my readers, etc.  I overcome this by just noodling around for a while weighing different approaches, and then just starting to write – usually the post falls into place.  Finally, I am still working on my ‘niche’ – do I write predominately for the passionate group of classic film aficionados, or do I write for those who may be new to classic film and want to explore?  Ideally I want to be accessible and interesting to both audiences – would love other CMBA members perspective on that dilemma!

  1. What advice would you give to a new blogger?

Technology has made setting up and maintaining a blog pretty easy, so don’t be intimidated by that.  I would also suggest allowing your own voice to come through in your blog posts – the best bloggers in my opinion have a definite writing style that’s fun to read. Finally, meet other bloggers by joining blogathons and embrace the community! That helps to keep motivation up.

Thanks so much, Jocelyn! Keep on obsessing for us!

Thursday, February 15, 2018

CMBA Profile: Louise Brooks Society

The CMBA profiles one of our classic movie blogs each month. This month we're featuring Thomas Gladysz, of the Louise Brooks Society:
The Louise Brooks Society is one of the most prolific and professional of the blogs in CMBA. Almost every day, there are updates on the site, and the writing and information is top-notch. It's a blog with a very specific focus - a silent film goddess with a short career but an iconic image. Author Thomas Gladysz has been running the society for over twenty years now, and he never seems to run out of things to say or images to share Louise and her world. 
Thomas couldn't choose just one blog entry for you to look at, instead he advises  you to, "start with the most recent entry and simply scroll back words in time. If I have done a decent job, you will keep going." His blog can be found at
Here are his questions to our interview questions:
What sparked your interest in classic film?
-- I remember my father liking gangster movies of the 1930s, as well as Laurel & Hardy, so I suppose his tastes affected mine to some degree. However, as a young teen, I was a contrarian. And my tastes were formed by what I could see on television. My favorite films then were John Huston’s Moby Dick (1956), Richard Lester’s A Hard Day’s Night (1964), and Francois Truffaut’s Fahrenheit 451 (1966). I grew up near Detroit, and I guess I was a bit idiosyncratic, as far as suburban kids were concerned. The first silent film I remember seeing was Faust (1926), which I picked up late one night on a UHF TV station out of nearby Canada. I was wowed. The scene where Mephisto spread his cape over the city blew my teenage mind. Visually speaking, I hadn’t seen anything like it before, and wouldn’t again until college when I saw the dream cinema of Jean Cocteau.
I launched the Louise Brooks Society website in 1995. I did so after having seen Louise Brooks in Pandora’s Box (1929). I was gob-smacked. I wanted to learn more about Brooks, to see every one of her films, and to meet others who shared by enthusiasm. I read everything I could get my hands on, and tracked down each of her available films. One thing lead to another…. Interest in G.W. Pabst – the director of Pandora’s Box and Diary of a Lost Girl (1929) – led to an interest in his contemporaries, Lang and Murnau, as well as German Expressionism. Interest in the silent era and the Jazz Age led to an interest in flappers and F. Scott Fitzgerald and Clara Bow and Colleen Moore. My wife loves Buster Keaton and Ronald Colman and Erich von Stroheim, and I developed an interest in them as well. Louise Brooks, you might say, has been my education.
What makes a film a "classic" in your opinion?
-- A movie has to have a strong personality, or at least an alluring personality. Does that mean I follow the auteur theory? Perhaps so, but perhaps not. I was an English major in college, and I’ve always been drawn to films based on books. Another couple of longstanding favorites are Stanley Kramer’s Inherit the Wind (1960) and David Lean’s Doctor Zhivago (1965). I can’t tell you how many times I’ve watched each of the various films (and the TV series) based on Dumas’ The Count of Monte Cristo. I love that story. As a matter of fact, I love films about outsiders, loners, losers and those who are misunderstood or have been wronged. I guess that says more about me than about the classic status of a film. Obviously, some “classic films” are more successful than others as works of art. Individual films become classics for all manner of reasons. Some films considered great I find dull. Some films considered banal or silly I find enjoyable, like My Man Godfrey (1936) and The Incredible Mr. Limpet (1964). I know what I like.
What classic film(s) do you recommend to people who say they hate old movies?
-- That’s a tough one. I would ask what contemporary films they like and try to think of a similar film from the past – provided the viewer can get past the technological hurdles, like black-and-white film, crude special effects, or the lack of spoken dialogue. Many of the Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton films and some of the pre-code films are classics because they transcend time. They are  “universal.” They still speak to a generation of viewers who’ve grown up on special effects.
If someone were to ask what Louise Brooks film they should watch, I would suggest Diary of a Lost Girl over Pandora’s Box.  Both are great films, but both are also problematic. Each is dark and a little depressing, which may turn-off some viewers. Also, both films were heavily censored, and what we have today is not quite complete, despite all the restoration work done on them. All-in-all, I would say Diary holds together a little better. Another recommended downer is Beggars of Life (1928). It’s a terrific film. Love Em and Leave Em (1926) is a very different Brooks’ film from those I just mentioned. It is fun, and a typical film of its time. I wish somebody would restore it.
Why should people care about classic film?
-- Kevin Brownlow once said: “Silent pictures show us how we lived and what our attitudes were. And as an art form, they can be wonderfully entertaining and often inspirational.” I think that pretty much explains it.
What is the most rewarding thing about blogging?
-- Feedback. It is gratifying when readers post comments or show interest in what I’ve written. But I am not in it for the applause, because there is very little of that. Maybe I’m just talking to myself, but I started my blog as a form of dialogue with the world, with those who love watching, reading about, thinking about, and researching old movies. Classic film will never achieve a mass audience – just like my blog or the Louise Brooks Society website will never achieve a mass readership. But a few hundred or a few thousand are all right with me. I keep on. It’s what I do.
I started the Louise Brooks Society blog in 2002, first on LiveJournal, and later I moved it to Blogger, where it now resides. A couple hundred have subscribed. I am a bit proud of the fact that I’ve kept it going all this time. Sometime this year, I will have posted for the 3000th time.
What challenges do you face with your blog, and how do you overcome them?
-- Despite the narrow focus of my blog – one film star with a short career – I seldom run out of things to write about. I’ve joked “all roads lead to Louise Brooks.” And no matter how seemingly unrelated a topic might be, I always try to somehow relate it to Brooks or the silent era. (Trust me, I never stray that far.) The novelist Salman Rushdie once said, "To understand just one life, you have to swallow the world." That’s my motto.
 What advice would you give to a new blogger?
-- Be yourself. Your blog can be anything you want it to be. Don’t imitate others, but also, importantly, don’t be ignorant of what others have done. Check out other bloggers! A good novelist is someone who reads lots of fiction. And a good blogger is someone who reads other blogs. Who knows? Other bloggers might well have done something that inspires or informs what you are trying to do.
Bring the real world into this digital medium. Read print books! Research something you are curious about. Visit a library or archive or historical museum to find out more about your subject. Explore your local connection. If you like Jean Harlow or William Powell or Esther Ralston, find out where their films where shown in your town… and what the local critics thought of them. Did your favorite star ever visit your town or city? There are a million angles.
Also, take advantage of all that the internet has to offer to enrich your blog – like newspaper and magazine archives, audio sources like SoundCloud, social media (it pays to get the word out), and the “community” of other film lovers. Your blog is a journey. Be open to possibilities. Explore. Have fun.
Thanks for sharing so much, Thomas! Louise Brooks couldn't ask for a better advocate!